Thursday, December 17, 2015

Criminal charges laid in Ontario Liberal gas-plant cover-up scandal

Finally criminal charges have been laid in the Ontario Liberals' gas plant scandal.
Unfortunately, it wasn't any of Ontario's Liberal politicians who were charged - maybe that is next?
Who gave these people the permission and the direction to enter Ontario government offices and purposefully delete the computer files??! Are we to believe that they just walked in off the street, and did all this on their own - and no Ontario Liberal politician knew about it?!??
They were even paid to do it - the Ontario Liberals had taxpayers paying for the (alleged) crime!!
The purposeful deletion / coverup of the scandalous gas plant emails was a political act perpetrated to help Ontario's Liberals win a fraudulent election - all based on GreenFear propaganda.
This is MPP Jim Bradley's kind of Liberalism. Vote fer Good Ole Jimmy. Yay!

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

Ontario Liberals blow billions on energy, while local paper coddles Liberal MPP Jim Bradley

Further to the CBC's Dec.2, 2015 story outlining Ontario Auditor Bonnie Lysyk's latest report slamming the outrageous energy costs and waste in Liberal-run Ontario:
"Ontario's auditor general says electricity customers in the province have paid billions of dollars for the Liberal government's decisions to ignore its own planning process for new power generation projects.
The Ontario Power Authority's 20-year technical plan, which was updated every three years and reviewed by the Ontario Energy Board, would have offered protection to consumers, said Bonnie Lysyk in her annual report released Wednesday. 
 Instead of following the legislated process, the Ministry of Energy itself effectively assumed responsibility for electricity planning," she said.
The ministry issued policy plans and 93 directives that the auditor said "did not fully consider the state of the electricity market, did not take long-term effects fully into account," and sometimes went against the OPA's advice.
"Ontario electricity ratepayers have had to pay billions for these decisions," she said.
The electricity portion of hydro bills for homes and small businesses rose 70 per cent between 2006 and 2014, which Lysyk said cost consumers $37 billion dollars in so-called global adjustment payments to generators — and will cost ratepayers another $133 billion by 2032"


Yep: energy policy was run right out of the Ministry of Energy's Liberal political re-election campaign office!

Let's hope that no-one from the St.Catharines Standard asks Liberal MPP Jim Bradley to explain his GreenFear delusion-based energy fiascos in Ontario! (Somehow, Grant Lafleche won't find any... er... 'scientific' issues here, eh??? What's Ole Jimmy got to do with any o' this?! hahah... unreal!)


Billions of tax dollars blown by Bradley and his Liberals - yet the newspaper in his own city stubbornly refuses to call Bradley on his climate-change insanity.
*

Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Wealthy Liberal Trudeau should "do the "right thing" and pay for his own nannies

In what has instantly been dubbed "Nannygate", the CBC has reported that Canadian multi-millionaire Justin Trudeau has already hired nannies at tax-payer expense: "The disclosure comes after an election campaign where Trudeau repeatedly attacked the Conservatives' enhanced universal child care benefit, or UCCB, and income splitting for families, arguing rich families like his and former prime minister Stephen Harper's didn't need taxpayers' help."


Back in this Sept.21, 2012 interview, Justin Trudeau's wife Sophie Gregoire was quoted saying: "I don't have a nanny but both grandmothers are helping out. I also found an amazing babysitter who can help out at night time when we have events to attend.
My priority is my family. Everything else comes second. So I have to decline many invitations, work opportunities, etc. I know and feel that it's the right thing to do.
"
'Right thing to do', eh? Yes, indeed... how 'humble', how... umm... 'sincere'... then!! But now, flying the entire family of kids, wife and "staff" to the Paris GreenFear Climate Coven is the right thing to do, eh? Oh, the Sunny Waves of Liberal entitlement.


In an April 2013 Montreal Families interview, Sophie Gregoire also said she did NOT have a nanny.


Yet, in this Toronto Star Aug.17, 2013 report, Justin Trudeau strangely claimed that they DID have a nanny, who was there overnight at their house during that bizarre break-in at their rented Rockcliffe (Ottawa) home.


Normally, it'd be any family's personal business whether they had a nanny or not; but now - upon hearing that Canada's rich Prime Liberal Hypocrite Turdeau suddenly does have two nannies employed at taxpayers' expense - it has become our business.


In this situation, both Trudeau and his spouse have shown themselves to be nothing more than Liberal hypocrites, already getting their fill at the entitlement trough.That didn't take long - less than a month after the Liberals took office!


Don't worry: there will be many more LibScams to follow, with Turdo as PM! {Remember Turdo's self-entitled charging of speaking fees to appear at charity fund-raisers - while he was also a sitting Liberal MP, slacking off from the House? This is the template of the Sunny Way!}


This is just the sad beginning of the inbred Turdopian Liberal Nanny-State darkness - like the story about the $1,800.00 per day gravy-train salary being given out in Denis Coderre-ville (former-Liberal-hack Fred Flintstone's Montreal) to "coordinate" what is essentially a welcome wagon for Montreal's anticipated Syrian refugee arrivals..!


When Liberal budgets 'balance' themselves, Liberal largesse has no bounds!
*
Let's now update to the Ottawa Citizen's Glen McGregor reporting late afternoon on Dec.1, 2015, that "the two nannies hired by Justin Trudeau to work at his new residence were previously employed by his family to look after his children, a cost he is passing on to taxpayers now that he is prime minister.
Marilou Nemiada Trayvilla and Marian Pueyo were hired last month as “special assistants” in the prime minister’s residence, although their roles appear chiefly to be providing child care to the three Trudeau children, who are 19 months, six years and eight years old."


If (...and note: IF) what Justin Trudeau now says is true, then, why the hell do we have to pay for this personal arrangement, which they supposedly already had? Let Justin and Sophie continue paying for their own nannies!


But wait - is what Justin is now saying true, that these nannies were "just hired"?
Remember, wife Sophie has already claimed that they did not have a nanny, as late as Apr. 2013.
Then, by Aug.17, 2013 - right after that bizarre break-in at their rented Rockcliffe home - Justin said that there was a nanny there that night.


So we have to ask: who was the nanny that the Trudeau's had working in their Rockcliffe house in 2013?
Why do taxpayers need to now know about this?
Well, because McGregor also reported in detail that:
"Trayvilla appears to have moved with family from Philippines to Ottawa and about five years ago was working for Ottawa lawyer Kirsten Crain and her husband, John Morales, who lived around the corner from the home Trudeau later rented in Rockcliffe.
Crain declined to say whether Trayvilla was hired through the special government program that gives temporary work visas to foreign child care workers brought to Canada.
Trayvilla went to work for another family, then ended up with the Trudeaus after Justin Trudeau won the leadership of the party and moved from Montreal into a home on Manor Avenue in Ottawa.
She posted pictures of her and the Trudeau family on her Facebook page from last Christmas.
The Prime Minister’s Office confirmed that Pueyo also worked for the Trudeau family previous. Both women are Canadian citizens, the PMO says.
Even though the two women worked as nannies when Trudeau was only leader of the third party, the PMO maintains that child-care in only part of their jobs providing “assistance” at the residence.
“Given the nature of the prime minister’s responsibilities and his young family, the Trudeaus employ two household employees who, in addition to performing other duties around the house, act as secondary caregivers to the three children,” spokesperson Kate Purchase told the CBC".


What McGregor has NOT specifically said in his report, is whether any of these two current nannies (who now work for PM Trudeau) also worked for Trudeau back then at Rockcliffe!
McGregor beats around the bush on this point, but he doesn't quite reveal that important detail!
The PMO office is also fudging the specifics here.
Was the 2013 nanny who had worked for the Trudeau's during the break-in (...ie, the nanny that Justin said was there...) the same nanny who had worked for that Rockcliffe lawyer, and the same nanny who is with PM Justin now?!
Or was that that some other nanny in 2013?


The reason this is now relevant to taxpayers and to those who voted for Justin, is that because if one of these current nannies was working for the Trudeaus in Rockcliffe during the time of that 2013 break-in, then what Trudeau's Liberals are saying NOW - that the nannies were just "hired last month" - would be a patent lie!


It would mean that they were NOT "hired last month"; it would mean that they had already been working for the Trudeaus!
It would also clearly mean that Justin Trudeau is already trying to pull off a fraud.
Why should taxpayers pay for any of this??


Kate Purchase is a good buddy of the CBC's Liberal-fawn-boy Peter Mansbridge - why is Peetah so quiet about all this?!
*
Then, Julie Smythe reported in the Dec.2, 2015 Globe and Mail:
"Before Justin Trudeau became Prime Minister, his family employed two nannies, one at night and one during the daytime. Like most nannies, the women did other jobs too, cleaning, some cooking, preparing kids’ snacks and other household duties.
That the Trudeaus had hired help is not new or surprising, given their schedules with three children eight and under, and the fact they come from a privileged background.

But two nannies? Day and night child care? That is excessive by most parenting standards, even for a prime minister. Should the public purse now pay for their two nannies to care for Xavier, Ella-Grace and Hadrien?
Even before her husband was elected to the highest office in Canada, Sophie GrĂ©goire-Trudeau had a full life outside the home – volunteering, speaking out on issues such as bulimia, attending political functions and teaching some yoga. She does not work full-time, but helps important causes, is a busy mom and political wife.
In addition to her nannies, she also relies on her mother and mother-in-law to help. Before they moved to the “cottage” on the grounds of Rideau Hall, Ms. GrĂ©goire-Trudeau could be seen at the local kids’ park with a nanny and her mother, the three women all fussing over the youngest Trudeau child. Her daytime nanny would also accompany her and Hadrien to lunch at popular restaurants in the Ottawa Byward Market..."
Again - it is not quite clear here, exactly when the Trudeau's "employed two nannies"!
Sophie Gregoire had made a point of telling us that she had NO nannys at all!
Are we talking of 2012 here? 2013? 2014? Only 2015??
Again: why is this relevant? Because if the Trudeaus already had two nannies (as seems to be the case, despite the obfuscation and contradictions from both spouses) then, the nannies were not "just hired", they were already employed .
The wealthy Trudeaus, with this blatantly hypocritical, let-them-eat-cake shell-game, foisted their own previous, personal arrangement onto the tax payer.
*

Monday, November 30, 2015

Where are the nude paintings of Justin Trudeau, Kathleen Wynne, or Jim Bradley?!

Further to this CBC report, I wonder where all those other "tasteful" paintings are, of any other Canadian politicians?!
How about a nice oily canvas with Tom Mulcair lounging on a chaise, hanging out his family jewels for the snickering masses? Where's the nude painting of Liberal GreenFear-monger Jim Bradley?? Funny, that no one at the St.Catharines Standard or the CBC is asking about that!! Are any paintings of a naked Turdeau available? No nude depictions of Kathleen Wynne?
Every time you looked at any of those other politicians, wouldn't you also "burst out laughing", as the CBC's pompous-sounding interviewee, Ghahramani, said, about his newly-bought piece of Harper-hate, er, art? This supposed "biting political satire" just panders to the harper-haters, who themselves 'come from a politically vulgar, dark, depressing point'.
*

Sunday, November 29, 2015

Jim Bradley's Liberal wind-turbine fraud



Just a month ago, on Oct.29, 2015 there was this report on the quiet removal of the massively underperforming turbine which had been located at the Lisgar GO station. What's that all about, you ask?!


Let's go back to an earlier story, in the Oct.25, 2013 Toronto Star, "GO Transit wind turbine producing 91% less power than expected", which had a great photo of Liberal GreenFear-monger Jim Bradley, as Transportation Minister, posing proudly at the 2009 unveiling of this disaster, another of his Liberal GreenFraud experiments.


Funny, isn't it, how no "reporter" at the St.Catharines Standard could be bothered to interview their local MPP - the very same Jim Bradley - about this further sad fiasco in a continuous string of billion-dollar green fiascos, based on his Malthusian-deluded green ideology!


So what that another 600,000++ tax dollars were clearly wasted by Bradley's Liberals, in their GreenFear-based long-con!!! The Standard's job is to ensure that their Sweet Greenie Jim is safely protected from scrutiny, while his Liberals screw Ontario's taxpayers.
*

Evil GreenFear-monger Maurice Strong a god to Justin Trudeau's Liberals

Canada's Liberal Prime Minister, the global GreenFear-pushing Justin Trudeau, is moaning about the death of socialist Maurice Strong, who was a hero to many of Canada's sick Liberals and socialists.


Let's go back a few years to 2007...
  ...(back when Ontario's Godfather of GreenFear, Liberal MPP Jim Bradley, had already been propagating his Malthusian views for decades; so both Strong and Bradley (a fellow climatalarmist TM and Kyodiot TM) have become bastard "godfathers" of the climate-change / global-warming hoax! The climate con-man Al Gore was a latecomer compared to those two grifters! Writer Peter Foster in 2008 described Maurice Strong as the "den father of radical environmentalism! Back in 1986, the Toronto Star ecstatically ejaculated all over Liberal Jim Bradley, officially anointing him as no less than an "environmentalist's saint" !!)...
...when writers Claudia Rosett and George Russell had written their detailed article about the sleazy socialist Maurice Strong, whom they noted was also touted as the 'Godfather of the environmental movement' - read "At the United Nations, the Curious Career of Maurice Strong" to see what Jim Bradley's and Green-Shift peddler Stephane Dion's fellow climate-change kool-aid-drinker was up to.


And, let's go back to 2012, to read Tom DeWeese's description of Maurice Strong in the "The Most Dangerous Man In The World":
"...This is a speech I first gave to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in 1996, just four years after the UN’s Earth Summit in Rio. At the time I gave this address there were strong indications that Maurice Strong could be chosen as the next UN Secretary General. It didn’t happen, but that didn’t diminish his influence over the body. In fact, In 1996 all roads in the UN led to Maurice Strong. This speech represented the first time that the CPAC audience and most conservatives had ever heard of the radical agenda of the environmental movement. It was probably the first time the term Sustainable Development was ever heard by a conservative audience. In fact, at the time I gave this speech, environmentalism was the most popular and most powerful movement in the world. Yet, here, 15 years before “Climategate” I was revealing the very root of what was to become the “Climate Change” movement and its drive to destroy the industrial West. By the way, tapes of this speech became the most popular of any ever produced by the American Policy Center and continues to be one of our best sellers. TD
Let me begin by asking you a few questions. They may seem rather silly – but I have a point. So, please, just indulge me for a moment – just answer with a show of hands:
How many of you know of Adolf Hilter – and that he was evil? How many of you know Mao Tse Tung – and that he was evil? How many of you know of Lenin and Stalin – and that they were evil?
How many of you know of  Maurice Strong – and that he is evil?"...


In a Nov.28, 2015 CBC story, Justin Trudeau just, uh, forgot to mention Maurice Strong's disgusting involvement the corruption-infested UN Oil For Food scam, or Strong's disgusting connections to Canada's wealthy Liberals!!
The CBC reports Justin Turdeau spewing the usual leftist meme about Strong being a pioneer in "sustainable development"- but what does that crap mean?


Does Turdeau himself understand what his Agenda 21 handlers are telling him to say?!
Well, as it happens, writer DeWeese had already pre-explained what Trudeau (and his fellow Turdobot Agenda 21 clones) actually mean, when they speak about "sustainability":
"...The assault on property rights – in fact the entire radical environmental agenda – is being driven by the United Nations. And Maurice Strong is the number one force behind UN environmental policy. Maurice Strong is the leader of a radical contingent of Environmentalists that believe technology and modern industrialization must be stopped.
Does that sound overstated or too extreme? Well, let me read you a much more radical statement and these are not my words – they’re Maurice Strong’s:
In 1992, Strong told a UN conference…: “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class, involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work place air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.”
Now, let me explain this new term “Sustainable” that you will see popping up in environmental policy more and more. Radical greens believe that all of man’s activities on Earth are harmful (and therefore not sustainable). They believe that man is a cancer on the Earth. Their goal is to slowly cut back and finally end all development and reduce human habitat to specific areas while the rest of the world is turned into wilderness..."


Maurice Strong typified the mentality of GreenFear-pushing fellow travellers, such as Liberal MPP Jim Bradley. Strong spawned the kind of barely-cloaked Malthusian climate fascism propagated by Jim Bradley's Ontario Liberals, and by St.Catharines MP Chris Bittle's federal Liberals.


This is the climate-change/global-warming /CO2 GreenFear-mongering scam which Justin Turdeau, Kathleen Wynne, and their sycophants are propagating, locally and internationally - even right now, at the Paris Climate Coven Conclave.


If Liberal MPP Jim Bradley has already been deified to the exalted status of an "Environmentalists' Saint', then Maurice Strong will be glorified by Trudeau's Gaian green-bolsheviks as nothing less than a Malthusian Climate God.
*

Saturday, November 21, 2015

Kathleen Wynne's Ontario Liberals implement HoskinScare TM health-care cuts

Further to this previous post...
Let's move forward to Chris Malette's Nov.21, 2015 Inside Belleville Metroland Media report about health-care cuts being implemented in Belleville, Ontario, where the QHC "admitted that the news was difficult to announce. The restructuring is intended to allow QHC to remove $11.5 million in expenses next year in order to operate within its reduced funding levels from the province. This includes a $7-million reduction in administration/support departments and $4.5 million in patient care areas, QHC said"
This is the EXACT same duplicitous healthcare-cutting template, which the Liberals followed in Niagara!
Liberal healthcare hack Hoskins is doing the same things that Smitherman, Caplan, and Matthews did before him.
The healthcare budget is set at the whim of health minister Eric Hoskins' monopolist Liberals - therefore, cuts need to be made... end of story!
As an Ontario patient, you have no other choice -
this is HoskinScare TM for you - thanks Dr. Eric!
And: isn't it sadly funny, how Metroland writer Chris Malette didn't even mention the words Kathleen Wynne, Liberal, or Eric Hoskins, in his story!! It's as if... let's see... oh yeah: it's as if Liberals have NOTHING TO DO WITH IT !!!
Wow!! Nice 'reporting' - anyone reading this Metroland Media half-story would never know that any Liberal had anything to do with these health care cuts!!! Amazing!!! Malette's article is the kind of article that could be found in Postmedia's St.Catharines Standard, where MPP Jim Bradley and his Liberal policies have been routinely babied and coddled by the local press, for decades!!!
I'm sure that if this same scenario had unfolded under 'harris', it would have been gleefully noted dozens of times per Metroland article!! (Metroland Media never lets readers down, eh, Mr. Beland Honderich?!)
Here's Belleville's MPP, Progressive Conservative Todd Smith, speaking about the QHC cuts - isn't it funny that Metroland Media reporter Malette didn't even ask the local MPP for an interview!!!
MPP Todd Smith said:
"Fall is in the air and because it is, that can only mean one thing: Another round of cuts and staff uncertainty at Quinte Healthcare hospitals. To make up for an $11.5-million funding shortfall created largely because Ontario’s Liberal government can’t manage money, jobs and services will be cut at hospitals in Picton, Belleville, Bancroft and Trenton. Money is being spent on debt that people in Prince Edward–Hastings want spent on the services they need in their hospitals.
This morning, we learned that in order to close the $11.5-million shortfall, QHC is proposing a reduction of nearly all surgery services at Trenton Memorial, $4.5 million in direct care cuts and changes that one QHC executive calls “very hard on our staff.”
During the years of this government, QHC has been the recipient of almost continual funding shortfalls from the ministry.
Speaker, if I could, I’d like to direct some comments directly to my constituency back at home: The deficit this government is running is costing you your health care services. QHC has had to come up $25 million in cuts over four years to make up for funding shortfalls because the Liberal government at Queen’s Park doesn’t have any money left. The government says money is going into better home care services but the Auditor General says services are being cut there too to pay for fat-cat salaries.
The third largest expense in the budget is how much we pay to service our debt and it’s also the fastest growing.
That’s why cuts like this have gone from being rare to happening annually."

Yet if one reads only Malette's Metroland Media 'report', one would think - as residents of Niagara were similarly conditioned to believe by their local media - that it was just the board of the local hospital making all these 'decisions'!
The link to the Ontario Liberal government's direct monopolist diktat of health-care cuts is not clearly made, at all!!
This is Liberal healthcare duplicity, in its finest most despotic mode.
Let's note again - before Liberal monopoly-supporting, single-payer-defending sycophants start deflecting blame onto the QHC - that the blame squarely belongs to Kathleen Wynne's health-cutting, monopoly-pushing Liberals.
As similarly happened in Niagara, the NHS and the NHS's CEO were conveniently targeted as scapegoats for implementing what were purely Liberal-mandated monopolist health-care cuts.
In Niagara, local Liberal MPP Jim Bradley sat back and smiled contentedly as the local media spun blame onto the NHS - while all along it was Bradley's duplicitous Ontario Liberal government which created the phony budgets and the phony budget cuts in order to manipulate the health-care cuts.
Remember the meme: health-care cuts are 'good' when monopolist Liberals or the NDP do it!
*